Vermont Public is independent, community-supported media, serving Vermont with trusted, relevant and essential information. We share stories that bring people together, from every corner of our region. New to Vermont Public? Start here.

© 2024 Vermont Public | 365 Troy Ave. Colchester, VT 05446

Public Files:

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact or call 802-655-9451.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

#1Lib1Ref: Harnessing The Wisdom Of Librarians To Edit One Of The Largest Collaboration History

XKCD, creative commons
Commentator Stephanie Greene suggests that helping to clear the backlog of citations needed on Wikipedia is an important task and a thrill.

Wikipedia, operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, is arguably one of the first stops anyone makes in online research.

The free, crowd-sourced encyclopedia is also one of the largest collaborations in human history; so vetting its information is both critical and challenging.

When Alex Stinson, a Brattleboro-based strategist for the Wikimedia Foundation, was attending a conference a few years ago, discussion naturally turned to the many facts on Wikipedia that needed additional citations, or backing up.

In fact, there are currently more than 333,000 “citation needed” notices in the English wiki alone.

Credit screenshot, Wikipedia
An excerpt from Wikipedia's entry on "citations needed."

Wiki had just added a simplified citation hunting tool, which made verifying a statement quite easy. So Stinson decided to invite librarians to look up and supply one citation each.

Involving librarians not only taps a group skilled in assessing information sources, it also highlights the crucial role librarians play in helping people to evaluate what they read. And studies show that fewer than 20% of contributors to Wikipedia are women. So Stinson reasoned that with librarianship still being a largely female profession, reaching out to librarians might help narrow the internet’s gender gap.

A successful trial run was held in 2016 and another round of the #1Lib1Refcampaign is underway now.

And it’s not just for librarians. Until Feb. 3, anyone can sign up to edit a piece. The instructions are straightforward, and the satisfaction of nailing a citation is almost instant.

Wikipedia also welcomes articles from anyone who can meet its criteria. Stinson says you need at least two reputable published sources for your information. The subject must have broad public appeal and long term interest. And you must state up front why your article is worth inclusion.

Maintaining the quality of entries and edits is clearly a challenge. Most bad edits — called vandalism — are caught by machine learning tools, but the rest are caught by human volunteers. Every edit is preserved, so even when one has been removed or if there’s a point of contention, a human editor can restore the edit.

In this round so far, has already stacked up nearly 1,800 edits in at least 21 languages from 33 countries. To play even a tiny part in such a giant effort is a 21st century thrill.

Stephanie Greene is a free-lance writer now living with her husband and sons on the family farm in Windham County.
Latest Stories