Vermont Public is independent, community-supported media, serving Vermont with trusted, relevant and essential information. We share stories that bring people together, from every corner of our region. New to Vermont Public? Start here.

© 2024 Vermont Public | 365 Troy Ave. Colchester, VT 05446

Public Files:

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact or call 802-655-9451.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Explore our latest coverage of environmental issues, climate change and more.

Court Hears Challenge To Seneca Mountain Wind Permit

Vermont Law School sign on a fall day in October 2012.
Toby Talbot
Associated Press FIle
The Vermont Supreme Court heard arguments on Seneca Mountain Wind during its annual session at the Vermont Law School.

Opponents of a Northeast Kingdom wind project have asked the Vermont Supreme Court to overturn a permit to install test towers on Seneca Mountain. Their arguments center around balloons and aesthetics.

In their annual session at the Vermont Law School, justices heard arguments involving a Public Service Board decision to allow a wind developer to erect four test towers.

The towers would be up to 200’ high and located in the towns of Brighton, Ferdinand and Newark.

Attorney Brooke Dingledine, arguing for opponents of the project, told the court that the Public Service Board didn’t properly consider the impact the towers will have on the scenic landscape.

She said that’s because opponents weren’t permitted to loft balloons at the proposed sites to assess how visible the towers would be.

“How does one raise an issue about a criterion if they’re not permitted to develop the evidence necessary to put in for the court’s consideration?” she asked the justices.

Chief Justice Paul Reiber answered with his own query. “It’s a question of whether it’s a substantial issue or not, right?” he asked Dingledine.

Justice John Dooley raised a similar point, telling Dingeldine that the Public Service Board had considered aesthetics in making its decision.  

“I understand you couldn’t put in all the evidence you wanted, but it was addressed. So it wasn’t that you had no say about it,” Dooley said.

When it was time for Seneca Wind to defend the Public Service Board decision, Justice Beth Robinson asked the developer’s attorney if it seemed odd for the board to rule out gathering more information about scenic impact by saying there was no substantial impact.

“Therefore you don’t get to go on the property and do a balloon test for the purpose of helping us determine whether there’s an aesthetic issue. Isn’t that kind of circular?” Robinson said.

Seneca Wind attorney Karen Tyler said basically the opponents failed to convince the board that there was a good reason to collect more information.

“What the appellants had the opportunity to do was provide information to the board during the public comment process that could have persuaded the board that more exploration of the issue was required,” Tyler told the court.

The arguments before the court revolved around aesthetic concerns, but opponents also claim wind development on Seneca Mountain would be harmful to wildlife and hurt economic development in the area.

Seneca Wind's plans call for the eventual construction of about 20 turbines.

Steve has been with VPR since 1994, first serving as host of VPR’s public affairs program and then as a reporter, based in Central Vermont. Many VPR listeners recognize Steve for his special reports from Iran, providing a glimpse of this country that is usually hidden from the rest of the world. Prior to working with VPR, Steve served as program director for WNCS for 17 years, and also worked as news director for WCVR in Randolph. A graduate of Northern Arizona University, Steve also worked for stations in Phoenix and Tucson before moving to Vermont in 1972. Steve has been honored multiple times with national and regional Edward R. Murrow Awards for his VPR reporting, including a 2011 win for best documentary for his report, Afghanistan's Other War.
Latest Stories